Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Western States Medical Center
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 29, 2002No. 01-344PublishedCited by 268 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
Section 127(a) of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997 (FDAMA or Act), 111 Stat. 2328, 21 U. S. C. § 353a, exempts “compounded drugs” from the Food and Drug Administration’s standard drug approval requirements as long as the providers of those drugs abide by several restrictions, including that they refrain from advertising or promoting particular compounded drugs. Respondents, a group of licensed pharmacies that specialize in compounding drugs, sought to enjoin enforcement of the subsections of the Act dealing with advertising and solicitation, arguing that those…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by268 opinions
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comite De Jornaleros De Redondo Beach v. City of Redondo BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Byrum v. LandrethCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Farm Raised Salmon CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
263 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.