Legal Opinion

State v. Mull

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1975No. 7429SC876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Because defendant has failed to argue in his brief 'his first and fifth assignments of error, they are deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals o'f .North Carolina.

Defendant’s second assignment of error relates to the denial of his motions to nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. “By introducing testimony at the trial, defendant waived his right to except on appeal' to the denial of his motion for nonsuit at the close. of the State’s evidence. His later exception to the denial of his motion for non-suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. State v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. HittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. HobbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API