Legal Opinion

State v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 14, 1973No. 7326SC751PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant first assigns error to denial of his motion for a continuance made on the ground that his Tennessee attorney was committed to appear in the Tennessee Court of Appeals on the date upon which trial of this case was scheduled to begin and on the further ground that two defense witnesses from Tennessee had declined to appear voluntarily and defendant’s Tennessee attorney had been unable to process subpoenas to require their attendance by the time of the trial. “A motion for continuance is ordinarily addressed to the discretion of the trial judge and his ruling thereon is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Marshall Norman HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. CradleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. ChanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. BurkeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. HerenciaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API