Legal Opinion

State v. Logan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1975No. 7420SC1021PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s first assignment of error relates to the denial of his motion for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence. Under the rationale of State v. Aycoth, 272 N.C. 48, 157 S.E. 2d 655 (1967), defendant contends it was error to deny his motion. We disagree.

*51“By introducing testimony at the trial, defendant waived his right to except on appeal to the denial of his motion for nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence.” State v. Davis, 24 N.C. App. 683, 211 S.E. 2d 849 (1975), citing State v. Mull, 24 N.C. App. 502, 211 S.E. 2d 515 (1975), and State v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. AycothSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LillyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. JefferiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. LoganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API