Legal Opinion

State v. Curry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 2, 1975No. 7423SC1074Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant has abandoned all but three of his assignments of error for failure to argue them in his brief. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

*293The first assignment of error argued in defendant’s brief relates to the denial of his motion for a continuance. Defendant maintains it was prejudicial error for the trial court to deny his motion for a continuance after the solicitor read the court calendar in the presence of prospective jurors, since the calendar contained charges against the defendant other than the charges for which he was tried and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. MullCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API