Legal Opinion
City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 2003No. 22395PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] This case involves a challenge to an award of attorney fees and prejudgment interest in favor of Doug and Sherry Johnson (Johnsons) and against the City of Sioux Falls (City). By notice of review, Johnsons seek to challenge the constitutionality of the statutory prejudgment interest rate. We affirm the attorney fee award and remand for recalculation of prejudgment interest. We do not reach the constitutional question raised by Johnsons.
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
[¶2.] This case is before us for the third time. City commenced this action in 1995, seeking condemnation of a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Action Mechanical, Inc. v. Deadwood Historic Preservation CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Sioux Falls v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Sioux Falls v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. ClarkSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Duffy v. Circuit Court for the Seventh Judicial CircuitSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BowersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Wald, Inc. v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.