City of Sioux Falls v. Johnson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Johnsons were awarded $1.2 million as just compensation for their condemned property. City filed motions for remittitur and a new trial. The trial court denied both motions and City appeals. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On September 27, 1995, the City of Sioux Falls initiated an action to condemn three adjoining tracts of land owned by Doug and Sherry Johnson in Lincoln County, South Dakota. Condemnation of the property was necessary for a public right-of-way and an adjoining storm water drainage project. Johnsons’ property, which…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Kjerstad v. Ravellette Publications, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Ward v. LangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coyote Flats, L.L.C. v. Sanborn County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Nicolay v. StukelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Sioux Falls v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Sioux Falls v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Good Lance v. Black Hills Dialysis, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.