Wald, Inc. v. Stanley
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Appellants challenge the award of attorney’s fees in this mechanic’s lien foreclosure. They contend that the award was not “warranted and necessary” under SDCL 44-9-42. We find no abuse of discretion in the court’s award and affirm.
Background
[¶ 2.] Richard and Arvidene Stanley contracted with Wald, Inc. to remodel the Stanleys’ home. During the course of construction, the parties orally modified their written agreement on several occasions. These oral modifications were never reduced to writing and differing interpretations eventually followed. “Some things were…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Lytle v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Arneson v. ArnesonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Estate of O'KeefeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Toft v. ToftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Zhi Gang Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Zhang v. RasmusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Suvada v. MullerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Bingham Farms Trust v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.