Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORS, Circuit Judge.
[¶ 1.] Dr. Crisman sued Determan Clinic after he was fired by Dr. Determan. Dr. Crisman appeals the denial of double damages and the reduction of attorney fees. Dr. Determan filed a notice of review appealing the determination that Dr. Crisman was the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees. We affirm and remand for findings of fact and conclusions of law on attorney fees.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Dr. Determan owns and operates a chiropractic clinic known as Alternate Healthcare Center of the Black Hills or Determan Chiropractic, Inc., (Determan Clinic) in Rapid City, South Dakota.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Garnos v. GarnosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Sioux Falls v. KelleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Ryken v. RykenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Ridley v. Lawrence County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Eagle Ridge Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Credit Collection Services, Inc. v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Arrowhead Ridge I, LLC v. Cold Stone Creamery, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.