Legal Opinion

State v. Borland

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 1990No. 22275-9-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtForrest, J.

Kendrick P. Borland, Jr., appeals from his conviction of statutory rape in the first degree, claiming that the trial court erred in finding that the 4-year-old complaining witness was competent to testify, and in finding that her out-of-court statements were admissible under the child hearsay statute. We affirm.

On January 8, 1988, Borland was charged with one count of statutory rape in the first degree. The trial court conducted a hearing to determine the testimonial competence of the complaining witness, D.W., who was 4 years 1 month old at the time of trial. Following questioning by both…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. ParrisWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of GrassoWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re Personal Restraint of GrassoWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Matter of Dependency of AEPWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. WoodsWashington Supreme Court · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API