Legal Opinion
State v. Parris
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1982No. 48180-6PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.
The petitioner was charged as an accomplice in the unlawful delivery of a controlled substance. The trial court denied his motions to exclude statements made during the criminal transaction by the principal, who claimed his Fifth Amendment privilege and was therefore unavailable as a witness. The jury found the petitioner guilty and the Court of Appeals affirmed. State v. Parris, 30 Wn. App. 268, 633 P.2d 914 (1981).
The evidence shows that on May 14, 1979, one Milliron, an informant, contacted police officer Hurley and advised him that he had arranged a "buy" of heroin. Milliron telephoned…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Arthur BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- State v. SwanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court · 2002
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.