Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 27, 1891PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Water and watercourses. Damages. Before Judge Miller. Bibb superior court. April term, 1890. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin, Justice.

The precise question in this ease is whether the owner of land on the hank of a river can without liability erect on his own land an embankment which increases the overflow in times of flood upon the lands of the opposite proprietor to the injury thereof; or. is *247there any duty for each owner to receive upon his land the share allotted it by nature of the flood waters of the river. It is contended by defendant’s' counsel that the overflow from a river in time of flood or freshet is surface water, against which, by the common law, a man may protect himself without regard to the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cairo & Vincennes R. R. v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Gillham v. Madison County RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Sullens v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  5. McCormick v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Town of Jefferson v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Cairo, V. & C. Ry. Co. v. BrevoortU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1894
  3. Mayor of Albany v. SikesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  4. Cole v. Missouri, K. & O. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Keck v. VenghauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API