Legal Opinion
Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 3, 1982No. C-943PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
Our former opinion is withdrawn and this one is substituted by a majority of the Court.
Carl Schlipf and others, collectively referred to herein as Schlipf, brought suit against Exxon for recovery of damages for retained gas royalties and prejudgment interest on all royalties withheld by Exxon since April 1, 1978. Schlipf filed a motion for summary judgment which was contested by Exxon. Exxon did not file a motion for summary judgment. The trial court granted Schlipf⅛ motion for summary judgment on the retained royalties, but it denied the prejudgment interest claim. A…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Novak v. StevensTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by108 opinions
- Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- State Ex Rel. Latty v. OwensTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Houston Health Clubs, Inc. v. First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.