Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Latty v. Owens

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1995No. 95-0321PublishedCited by 283 opinions

1Per curiam

A party who timely appeals from the report of a family court master is entitled to a hearing de novo before the referring court. Tex.Gov’t Code § 54.012. In this case, we decide whether a district court’s order adopting a master’s report, that is signed after notice of appeal but before the required hearing, is a final appealable order. The court of appeals held that it was not. 893 S.W.2d 728. We disagree.

The State of Texas sued Kris Owens on behalf of Lorraine Latty at the request of the State of Louisiana under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA),…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. The State Bar of Texas v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mapco, Inc. v. ForrestTexas Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by283 opinions

  1. Freedom Communications, Inc. v. CoronadoTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In Re L.A.M. & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  3. Phillips v. BramlettTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Gordon v. Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  5. Custom Corporates, Inc. v. Security Storage, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

278 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API