Legal Opinion

Mafrige v. Ross

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1994No. D-2997PublishedCited by 299 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNYN, Justice.

The finality of judgments for purposes of appeal has been a recurring and nagging problem throughout the judicial history of this state. In this case we address the issue of whether the inclusion of “Mother Hubbard” language or its equivalent in an order granting summary judgment makes an otherwise partial summary judgment final for appeal purposes. 1 We conclude that it does.

Attorneys James Ross and Douglas Sutter filed this lawsuit in state court against twelve other attorneys and insurers after a $13 million personal injury judgment was entered against Ross and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Chessher v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by299 opinions

  1. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Park Place Hospital v. Estate of MiloTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lampasas v. Spring Center, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  4. Continental Airlines, Inc. v. KieferTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Welch v. McDougal, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1994

294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API