Legal Opinion

Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1959No. A-7237PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Civil Appeals has dismissed petitioners’ appeal, holding that the summary judgment granted by the trial court in favor of respondents and against petitioners on one phase of the case is interlocutory and not appealable. 320 S.W. 2d 915. No severance was ordered by the trial court, but petitioners say that the case involves two entirely separate, severable and independent causes of action, and that the summary judgment disposes of all issues and parties involved in one cause of action. They argue that under such circumstances the granting of the motion for summary judgment…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Myers v. SmithermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. Richards v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Gallaher v. City Transp. Co. of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Riggs v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Mafrige v. RossTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Teer v. DuddlestenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Pierce v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Houston Health Clubs, Inc. v. First Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API