Hink v. Sherman
Michigan Supreme Court
Error. to Lapeer; Smith, J. Case by Mary Hink against Robert F. Sherman, principal, and David Willis and Jesse Cypher, as sureties on a liquor bond, for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor to plaintiff’s minor son. Judgment for plaintiff of $500. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiff, the mother of a minor son of the age of 18 years, recovered a judgment against defendants, a retail liquor dealer and his sureties, under sections 5398, 5399, 2 Comp. Laws, for the unlawful sale of spirituous and intoxicating liquors to said minor. The facts in the case were disputed by defendants. What such facts were for the greater part is immaterial, and no benefit can be derived by any one from their statement, and pointing out wherein the parties disagreed. The verdict of the jury determined necessarily that an unlawful sale had been made to the minor, and such verdict was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scripps v. ReillyMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Detroit Daily Post Co. v. McArthurMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Ross v. LeggettMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Long v. Tribune Printing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Theisen v. JohnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Poledna v. Bendix Aviation Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Smith v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Smith v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984