Legal Opinion
Flex-Foot, Inc. And Van L. Phillips v. Crp, Inc. (Doing Business as Springlite)
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 2, 2001No. 99-1489PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINN, Circuit Judge.
CRP, Inc. d/b/a Springlite (“Springlite”) appeals the district court’s entry of judgment confirming an arbitration award, its holding that Springlite is collaterally es-topped from presenting its patent invalidity defenses and counterclaim, and its entry of judgment in favor of Flex-Foot, Inc. and Van L. Phillips (collectively “Flex-Foot”) for an injunction and an award of costs. See Flex-Foot, Inc. v. CRP, Inc., SACV 97-504 DOC (C.D. Cal. entered June 11, 1999). Because the district court did not err in affirming the arbitration award or entering judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Raymond Keith Foster, Keith Mfg. Co., and Keith Sales, Co. v. Hallco Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Olof A. HallstromCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. v. BaconCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Harris Corporation v. Ericsson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Joblove v. Barr Labs. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Qualcomm Incorporated v. Nokia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.