Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Walker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff brings this suit in the nature of an interpleader to have the rights of the creditors of the defendant A.W. Walker adjudicated and determined. Walker was engaged in the automobile business in Medford, Oregon. On February 11, 1921, nineteen second-hand automobiles, covered by standard insurance policies issued by plaintiff, were destroyed by fire. Walker, on April 7, 1921, made proofs of loss, but these were rejected by the insurance company as unsatisfactory and returned to the insured with certain specific objections thereto. On June 20, 1921, other proofs of loss were submitted…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Finch v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  3. Ackerman v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Brainard v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Girard Fire & Marine Insurance v. Field, Merritt & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. HutchinsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Mahomet v. Hartford InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  3. McClayton v. McClaytonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API