Mahomet v. Hartford Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C. J.
This case involves the adjudication of the rights and priorities of Hannah Cagley’s' creditors to insurance proceeds which were generated when Hannah Cagley’s furniture business was destroyed by fire; W. J. Gannon and Connelly Acceptance Corporation appeal from the trial court judgment holding that their writs of garnishment against three fire insurance companies did not create a lien on the insurance proceeds. Fred C. Dorsey, the trustee in bankruptcy for Cagley, appeals from that portion of the trial court judgment which granted Ray Hayes, Jr., a former attorney for Hannah Cagley, an…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Portland Ass'n of Credit Men, Inc. v. EarleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Finch v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Brainard v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Snyder v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Paste-Ups Unlimited, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Boundary Dam Constructors v. Lawco Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Robb v. KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Authority of Indian Tribal Court to Issue Garnishment Writs Under 42 U.S.C. § 662(e), Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.