Legal Opinion

Finch v. Great American Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 28, 1924PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The only question before us is whether, under the standard form of fire insurance policy, “a debt is due” from the underwriter to the insured, within the meaning of our foreign attachment statute, § 5915 of the General Statutes, after a loss by fire covered by the policy, and before proofs of loss are filed. It is not surprising that there should be a conflict of authority among the several States as to the validity of a garnishment made under such circumstances, because of the wide differences of statutory policy respecting attachments in general. See 28 Corpus Juris, p. 165, § 207.

Our own…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Emerson v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1833
  2. Phenix Insurance v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. New Haven Steam Saw-Mill Co. v. FowlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1859
  4. Ransom v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  5. Harris v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Crisp v. Security National Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Parker, Peebles & Knox v. El SaiehSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Security Building & Loan Ass'n v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Brainard v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Gray v. HouckTennessee Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API