Legal Opinion
Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 26, 1987No. 82-4149; CA A39363PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Plaintiff initiated garnishment proceedings against garnishees CML, Inc. (CML), and Mills, an attorney. The trial court dismissed the proceedings. Plaintiff challenges only the dismissal of garnishee CML. We reverse.
In 1971, plaintiff leased a nursing home to defendant Charapata, Inc., (Charapata), which later sublet to CML. Charapata defaulted on its lease obligations, and plaintiff obtained a judgment against it for $34,543.58. Plaintiff served writs of garnishment on these garnishees, each of whom returned certificates indicating that they held no property belonging to Charapata. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Argonaut Insurance v. Ketchen, Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. HutchinsOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Eisele v. Knight, Northern InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Solomon v. KennerOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shlim v. Charapata, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1989