Legal Opinion

Coastal Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Hutchins

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Plaintiff, a judgment creditor -of one Hutchins, appeals from a judgment exonerating a garnishee in proceedings to enforce creditors’ remedies pursuant to ORS 29.270 .through 29.370 ①

At all material times Hutchins was employed by United Saw Shop as a salesman. His compensation was an agreed commission out of which he was to pay all his expenses. There were two successive notices of garnishment. The present controversy arises from returns made by United showing no money due Hutchins. Hutchins was at all material times overdrawn on the books of his employer. There was no proof of fraud nor of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Meier v. HessOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Prudential Trust Co. v. Merchants' Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ralston Purina Co. v. KingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. WalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Harpster v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  3. Investment Service Co. v. SmitherOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Anchorage Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Anchorage Westward HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Myers v. ChristensenNebraska Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API