Legal Opinion

Anton v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1927No. 25,865PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Plaintiff appealed from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding a directed verdict or a new trial.

This is a railroad crossing accident case. Assuming defendant’s negligence, we go directly to the consideration of contributory negligence.

The city of Little Falls is divided by the Mississippi river which is bridged on Broadway street running east and west. Three of defendant’s tracks extending north and south cross Broadway at the west end of the bridge. Defendant’s passenger depot is located about 309 feet north of the center line of Broadway on a tract of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Jensen v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Wardner v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Bailey v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  2. Luce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  3. Alsaker v. DeGraff Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Wieden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Haase v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API