Wieden v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action for personal injuries wherein defendant had a directed verdict, and plaintiff appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The action comes from Marshfield, Wisconsin. There, soon after one a. m. December 25, 1927, plaintiff, while driving a taxicab, was run into by a passenger train of defendant eastward bound from the Twin Cities to Chicago. The negligence charged against defendant is excessive speed and failure to give warning by bell, both in violation of the Wisconsin statute hereinafter referred to. The verdict ivas directed for defendant on the ground that plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. YinglingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- White v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Elkins v. Western Maryland Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Roth v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Luce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Farden v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933