Legal Opinion
Harvey v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided January 10, 2000No. 3098PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, Judge:
Several current and retired employees of the South Carolina Department of Corrections filed suit, claiming they were erroneously enrolled in the South Carolina Retirement System. The trial court agreed and ordered their retroactive enrollment in the Police Officers Retirement System, but denied their claim for attorney fees. We reverse the trial court’s order concerning retroactive enrollment, but affirm the denial of attorney fees.
FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY
James L. Harvey, George N. Martin, W.T. Cave, James D. Beam, John H. Carmichael, and Judy Anderson (Employees) are current or…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
- Felts v. Richland CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Noisette v. IsmailSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
- Jackson v. SpeedSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Blumberg v. Nealco, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Historic Charleston Holdings, LLC v. MallonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Harris-Jenkins v. Nissan Car Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
- Seabrook Island Property Owners' Ass'n v. BergerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
- Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- King v. JamesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.