Legal Opinion
King v. James
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided April 20, 2010No. 4676PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
In this case, Beaufort County (the County) argues the Master erred in finding the two-year statute of limitations in South Carolina Code section 12-51-160 (Supp.2008) did not apply to Sheila King’s (King) action to set aside the 1999 tax sale of her property even though the action was brought in 2006. The County also contends the Master erred in finding the defenses of laches, estoppel, abandonment, acquiescence, and stale demand were inapplicable in this case. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This case involves a parcel of real property located in Hilton Head Island, South Carolina (the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- ML-Lee Acquisition Fund, L.P. v. DeloitteSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- United States v. Administrative Enterprises, Incorporated, Principal Services, Incorporated, Zion Ventures, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Hallums v. HallumsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- United States of America and Earl E. Hart, Revenue Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Stanley P. GimbelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Hawkins v. Bruno Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spur at Williams Brice Owners Ass'n v. LallaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
- In re Checking Account Overdraft LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2012
- Jenkins v. Refuge Temple Church of God in Christ, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Reeping v. JEBBCO, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013
- Forfeited Land Comm'n of Bamberg Cnty. v. BeardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.