Legal Opinion

Noisette v. Ismail

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1991No. 23373PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finney, Justice:

Petitioner Penn National Insurance Company (Penn National) appeals from the Court of Appeals’ opinion which affirmed in part, vacated in part, reversed in part and remanded this declaratory judgment action to the circuit court. Noisette v. Ismail, 299 S.C. 243, 384 S.E. (2d) 310 (Ct. App. 1989). We reverse that portion of the Court of Appeals’ ruling which vacated the trial court’s judgment that Penn National is liable for damages recovered by Respondent Lurline Noisette (Noisette) and remanded to the trial court for further consideration the issue of whether Defendant Bassem…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Halbersberg v. BerryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  2. Noisette v. IsmailCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. May v. CavenderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  4. Borg Warner Acceptance Corp. v. DarbyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Pawley's Island Civic Ass'n v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Shealy v. Aiken CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  4. Rickborn v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. USAA Property & Casualty Insurance v. Clegg Ex Rel. Estate of CleggSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API