Legal Opinion

Fawn Lake Apartments v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1999No. 98-1516PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

When we reviewed this property for tax year 1991, the same two appraisers presented their estimates of value. For tax year 1991, Kocinski, on behalf of the owner, valued the property at $7,000,000, while Canitia, on behalf of the BOE, valued the property at $9,214,000. For tax year 1991, we affirmed the BTA’s determination that the true value of the real property was $8,291,810.

At the hearing before the BTA for tax year 1994, both appraisers testified that the property values in the area had been increasing for the past several years. The increase in property values since 1991 is reflected by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Witt Co. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wolf v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Freshwater v. Belmont County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ohio Pyro, Inc. v. Ohio Department of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Terraza 8, L.L.C. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Painter v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Valigore v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API