Legal Opinion

Witt Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1991No. 90-1252PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.

The issue presented to this court is whether the BTA erred in failing to consider the appraisal report and testimony of *157appellant’s expert witness, Kennedy. Appellant asserts that the BTA erred in refusing to accept or consider the testimony of and appraisal performed by Kennedy. In support, appellant argues that Kennedy was unaware of the contingency fee arrangement between his employer and appellant, and that whether his employer obtained an interest in the appeal should not affect his qualifications as an appraiser. Lastly, appellant contends that there is no requirement that an appraiser…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Crow v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. EOP-BP Tower, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Simmons v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Plain Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Freshwater v. Belmont County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. TBC Westlake, Inc. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API