Legal Opinion

Wolf v. Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-1575PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well-established that the fair market value of property for tax purposes is a question of fact and its determination is primarily within the province of the taxing authorities. This court will not disturb a decision by the BTA regarding valuation unless that decision is unreasonable or unlawful. Bd. of Revision v. Fodor (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 52 [44 O.O.2d 30]. The question presented is, therefore, whether the valuation of the subject property by the BTA at $5,730,000 was unreasonable or unlawful. This court concludes that it was not.

First, appellants argue that the failure of the BTA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Board of Revision v. FodorOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Columbus Board of Education v. J.C. Penney Properties, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. TBC Westlake, Inc. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Meijer, Inc. v. Montgomery County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. AERC Saw Mill Village, Inc. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Strongsville Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Fawn Lake Apartments v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API