Legal Opinion

Hills v. Hills

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1884No. 11,385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Black, C.

The appellant sued the appellee and five others for specific performance of a contract for the sale and conveyance to the appellant by the defendants, other than the appellee, of certain real estate, a town lot.

Issues formed were tried by the court, and a special finding was rendered. The only question before us is, whether the court erred in its conclusions of law.

The facts were stated by the court, in effect, as follows: On the 4th of March, 1876, the appellant being then the husband of the appellee, the former and the defendant Biggs D. Thomas executed said contract, said Thomas…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Muckenburg v. HollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Musselman v. MusselmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Behrley v. BehrleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Moon v. BaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Faught v. FaughtIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Davis v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Watson v. WatsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. State ex rel. Haines v. ParrishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API