Muckenburg v. Holler
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Marion Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, C. J.
The appellee was the plaintiff below. The complaint was in two paragraphs,-but inasmuch as the finding and judgment against the appellant were entirely upon the second paragraph, no very particular notice need be taken of the first, or the pleadings thereto, or the rulings of the court thereon; for whatever errors intervened in that regard could not possibly have injured the appellant.
The second paragraph- of the complaint avers, that while the appellant and the appellee were husband and wife, lawfully-married and cohabiting, he, at her request, erected upon a lot in Indianapolis, owned in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Goodwin v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1810
3Cited by34 opinions
- Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Walker v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Behrley v. BehrleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Roberts v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.