Legal Opinion

Behrley v. Behrley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1884No. 11,252PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From the Harrison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— We do not find it necessary to set forth all of .the allegations of appellant’s complaint, for there is one which conclusively shows that she can not maintain this action. The complaint seeks a recovery upon an antenuptial contract, and contains this allegation: “ That on the 9th day of August, 1882, she filed her application for a divorce against Remegius Behrley, on the ground of cruel treatment, and afterwards, at the September term, 1882, of the Harrison Circuit Court, and after full appearance to said suit, she was granted a divorce from the defendant on the ground of cruel treatment.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  3. Muckenburg v. HollerIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Williams v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Moon v. BaumIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Bowlus v. Phenix InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Nicholson v. NicholsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Walker v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Gold v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis RailwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API