Legal Opinion

Moon v. Baum

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1877PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Clay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.

Complaint in two paragraphs, brought by the appellant against the appellees. The paragraphs are essentially the same in legal effect; but, as the second is more full and specific in its averments than the first, we set it out at length:

“ And for second complaint, the said plaintiff says, that at the November term of the court of common pleas, held in and for said county in the year 1868, the said *195Margaret Baum obtained a decree of divorce from said defendant Andrew, on her cross bill, filed by one George W. Wiltse, as her atttorney, without her knowledge or consent, he being employed by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Krutz v. CraigIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Ewing v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Stedman v. BooneIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Sullivan v. LearnedIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Emerson v. EmersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  2. Earle v. EarleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. In re DoleHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1907
  5. Behrley v. BehrleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API