Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carlson v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 22, 2013No. A12-2286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

On December 21, 2012, Stephen W. Carlson, the Independence Party candidate in the 2012 election for United States House of Representatives for Minnesota’s Fourth Congressional District, filed a petition pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2012), seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Carlson asserts three claims in his petition. First, Carlson alleges that Minn. Stat. § 202A.16, subd. 2 (2012), which identifies those who can participate in and vote at a precinct caucus, violates his First Amendment rights. Second, he alleges that the Secretary of State improperly withheld from him…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StaffordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Fetsch v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Clark v. PawlentySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Martin v. DicklichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. Winters v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Begin v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Carlson v. RitchieDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
  4. Lewison v. HutchinsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  5. Moulton v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API