Lewison v. Hutchinson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtBjorkman, Judge
Relators, a political candidate and his campaign committee, challenge an order of the Minnesota Office of Administrative *447Hearings (OAH) determining that they prepared and disseminated campaign material without the disclaimer required by Minn. Stat. § 211B.04, subd. 1. Relators argue that (1) the disclaimer requirement violates the right to free speech, (2) the complaint alleging the violation was untimely, and (3) substantial evidence does not support the determination that relators violated the disclaimer requirement. We affirm.
FACTS
In March 2017, relator David Hutchinson was contemplating…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.