Legal Opinion

Lewison v. Hutchinson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 13, 2019No. A18-1700Published

1Opinion of the CourtBjorkman, Judge

Relators, a political candidate and his campaign committee, challenge an order of the Minnesota Office of Administrative *447Hearings (OAH) determining that they prepared and disseminated campaign material without the disclaimer required by Minn. Stat. § 211B.04, subd. 1. Relators argue that (1) the disclaimer requirement violates the right to free speech, (2) the complaint alleging the violation was untimely, and (3) substantial evidence does not support the determination that relators violated the disclaimer requirement. We affirm.

FACTS

In March 2017, relator David Hutchinson was contemplating…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Park Nicollet Clinic v. HamannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  5. Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API