Legal Opinion
Martin v. Dicklich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 5, 2012No. A12-1588PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*338OPINION
2Per curiam
Ken Martin and Erik Simonson filed a petition pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 204B.44 (2010). Petitioners seek an order requiring that respondents Donald Dicklich, the St. Louis County Auditor (“the County Auditor”), and Mark Ritchie, the Minnesota Secretary of State, place Simonson’s name on the ballot for the 2012 general election as the candidate of the Democratic-Farmer-Labor (“DFL”) Party for the office of State Representative for House District 7B. Petitioners contend that the County Auditor erred by refusing to accept the Affidavit of Withdrawal submitted by DFL-nominated candidate…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Christensen v. Hennepin Transportation Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Aronovitch v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Genin v. 1996 Mercury Marquis, VIN No. 2MEBP95F9CX644211, License No. MN 225 NSGSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. GaiovnikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, WardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. BoeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Jaimiah Lamar IrbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Carlson v. RitchieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.