Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.
Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff’s Third Motion for Class Certification (“Motion”), and concluding that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001), the court rules as follows.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Cynthia Spann (“plaintiff’) filed this action, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCPenney” or…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Petersen v. Costco Wholesale Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- Daly v. McFarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Freeman v. Indochino Apparel, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- In re Fyre Festival LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.