Legal Opinion

Spann v. J.C. Penney Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 18, 2015No. Case No. SA CV 12-0215 FMO (RNBx)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION

FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, District Judge.

Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to plaintiff’s Third Motion for Class Certification (“Motion”), and concluding that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R.Civ.P. 78; Local Rule 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir.2001), the court rules as follows.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Cynthia Spann (“plaintiff’) filed this action, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, against J.C. Penney Corporation, Inc. (“JCPenney” or…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Petersen v. Costco Wholesale Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Daly v. McFarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Freeman v. Indochino Apparel, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  5. In re Fyre Festival LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API