Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided April 16, 2019No. B292416PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtManella, P. J.
*134*384In the underlying actions, petitioner Los Angeles City Attorney, acting in the name of the People of the State of California, asserted claims under, inter alia, Business and Professions Code section 17501 against real parties in interest, alleging that they sold products online by means of misleading, deceptive or untrue statements regarding the former prices of those products. Real parties demurred to the claims, asserting that the statute contravenes free speech rights and is void for vagueness. After the trial court sustained real parties' demurrer without leave to amend on the ground…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Calcagno v. Kipling Apparel Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Estrada v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Estrada v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- In re White, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Joshua Orona, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Patagonia, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.