Legal Opinion
Prock v. HARTVILLE FEED, LLC
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 10, 2012No. SD 31310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DON E. BURRELL, Presiding Judge.
Russell Prock (“Claimant”) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying him unemployment compensation benefits under section 288.050.1(1) 1 because he voluntarily left his employment as a maintenance worker with Hartville Feed, L.L.C. (“Employer”) without good cause. 2 Because the Commission correctly determined that Claimant did not act in good faith in deciding to quit — an essential element of good cause — we affirm.
Applicable Principles of Review
“This Court may modify, reverse, remand, or set aside the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Sutton v. GoldenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Quik 'N Tasty Foods, Inc. v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Scrivener Oil Co., Inc. v. CriderMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Cooper v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kimble v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Darr v. Roberts Marketing Group, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Zachary Smith v. Greyhound Bus Company and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Bolden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Marjorie Richardson v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.