Bolden v. State

CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.

Jeffrey Bolden (“Bolden”) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his *659Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Bolden contends that the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion because (1) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to move to dismiss the charge of second degree assault of emergency personnel, because hospital security officer Monte Ruby (“Ruby”) was not “emergency personnel” within the meaning of section 565.082.2;1 and (2) appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue on appeal that there was…