Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. Murphy

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1995No. S-94-382PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

The State, through its Attorney General, relator Don Stenberg, brought this original action in quo warranto to oust respondent, John P. Murphy, a duly qualified and acting judge of the district court, from membership on the Nebraska Commission on Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice. The State alleges that respondent’s dual service as a judge and member of the commission violates the distribution of powers clause found in Neb. Const, art. II, § 1. Respondent has counterclaimed for an attorney fee and costs. For the reasons detailed hereinafter, we rule for the State on relator’s pleading and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. In Re GrobanSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Department of Natural Resources v. Linchester Sand & Gravel Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. State Of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
  2. Halverson v. HardcastleNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Calabro v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Duggan v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Slack Nursing Home, Inc. v. Department of Social ServicesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API