Legal Opinion

Trautman v. Hill

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1989No. 16874PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court’s prior opinion, dated November 3, 1988, is hereby withdrawn.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

In this appeal we are asked to determine whether a rent escalator clause in a commercial lease is valid and enforceable. The district court held that it was. We agree and affirm that ruling but we vacate the judgment and remand for modification of the judgment.

In August 1978 Glen and Marilyn Trautman entered into a lease agreement with Don Hill and Donald and LuNetta Wright. Under the agreement the Trautmans constructed and leased to the Wrights and Hill a building in Lewiston, Idaho, for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Loomis, Inc. v. CudahyIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Helm v. KramerWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Seattle-First National Bank v. EarlCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leathers v. LeathersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Crawford v. Department of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Duenke v. BrummettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. State v. HowellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Charles L. Anania v. Snowshoe Mountain, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API