Legal Opinion

State v. Howell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1992No. 19260PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Suzanne Howell appeared in magistrate division on a charge of driving a motor vehicle while having a blood alcohol content of more than 0.10 in violation of I.C. § 18-8004. On the date set for trial, and after the court denied the defendant’s motion for acquittal made at the end of the state’s case, the parties stipulated to the entry of Howell’s I.C.R. 11 conditional guilty plea. The judgment of conviction was upheld on appeal to the district court. This appeal followed. We affirm.

The principal issue on appeal deals with the alleged variance between the charge and the proof.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. State v. WindsorIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. United States v. Fred LambertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Robinson v. RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HauserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. Crawford v. Department of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. BarkerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. State v. Carlos Adrian Cruz-RomeroIdaho Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. HauserIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API