Legal Opinion
Masiello v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 11, 1990No. 87 Civ. 5057 (CHT)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TENNEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Catherine Masiello brings this action pursuant to the Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1988), against her employer Metro-North Commuter Railroad (“Metro- North”), and its predecessor, Consolidated Rail Corporation (“Conrail”). Plaintiff alleges that defendants were negligent in failing to protect her from various forms of sexual harassment which resulted in her suffering emotional and physical injuries. Defendants have moved for summary judgment arguing, inter alia, that plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wahlstrom v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Wilson v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Smolsky v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Stewart v. Alton & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.