Legal Opinion

Brisson v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1986No. 8616SC36PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

The sole question is whether the court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Under N.C. Gen. Stat. 1A-1, Rule 56, defendant is entitled to summary judgment if the record shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that [defendant] is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” “In ruling on a motion for summary judgment the evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Hinson v. Hinson, 80 N.C. App. 561, 343 S.E. 2d 266 (1986).

Plaintiffs contend that they have forecast evidence sufficient to establish either…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Vail v. VailSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guy v. GuyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. McCurry v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Dillingham v. DillinghamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Kapp v. KappSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Forbis v. NealCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API