Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Forbis v. Neal

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 17, 2006No. COA04-1495Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSteelman, Judge

I concur with the majority opinion’s holding that plaintiff has failed to show how defendant’s affidavit violates N.C. Gen. Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 601 (dead man’s statute). I respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority opinion holding that summary judgment was properly granted in favor of defendant as to the Paine Webber account. I concur in the granting of summary judgment as to the remaining accounts.

Factual Background

Bonnie Sustare Newell (Bonnie) and Gussie Lee Sustare (Gussie) were elderly sisters. Defendant was the nephew of the two sisters. On 5 November 1991 both Bonnie and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Southeastern Shelter Corp. v. BTU, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Compton v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Watts v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. McNeill v. . McNeillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API