Legal Opinion

Kapp v. Kapp

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1994No. 273PA93PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The first question posed by this appeal is whether the Uniform Trusts Act, N.C.G.S. § 36A-60 et seq., applies to this case and *300if so whether, as contended by the plaintiffs, N.C.G.S. § 36A-78 and N.C.G.S. § 36A-66 forbid the executors from conveying the real property to William. We affirm the Court of Appeals and hold that the. Act does not apply. N.C.G.S. § 36A-60 says:

As used in this Article unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires:(4) “Trust” means an express trust only.

N.C.G.S. § 36A-60 (1984).

Nothing in the language of Josephine’s will expressly creates a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Abbitt v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Link v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Curl by and Through Curl v. KeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Ellis Jones, Inc. v. Western Waterproofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Pearson v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
  2. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API