Negin v. Board of Building & Zoning Appeals of the City of Mentor
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
This case originated as an appeal from an administrative decision brought pursuant to R. C. Chapter 2506. The question presented by such an appeal challenging the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance as applied is “whether the ordinance, in proscribing a landowner’s proposed use of his land, has any reasonable relationship to the legitimate exercise of the police power by the municipality.” Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rocky River (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 23.
It is virtually axiomatic that the enactment of zoning laws by a municipality is an exercise of the police power to provide for the public…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- C. Miller Chevrolet, Inc. v. City of Willoughby HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. City of Rocky RiverOhio Supreme Court · 1974
- Garcia v. Siffrin Residential Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- Robyns v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Columbia Oldsmobile, Inc. v. City of MontgomeryOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Singer v. City of FairbornOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Reed v. Rootstown Township Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Zeltig Land Development Corp. v. Bainbridge Township Board of TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Trademark Homes v. Avon Lake Board of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.